Comments on: ng-nl. brief review https://stepansuvorov.com/blog/2015/02/ng-nl-brief-review/ Release 2.0 Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:32:07 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.1 By: ng-nl 2017. brief review (keep updating…) | Stepan Suvorov Blog https://stepansuvorov.com/blog/2015/02/ng-nl-brief-review/#comment-63369 Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:32:07 +0000 http://stepansuvorov.com/blog/?p=2334#comment-63369 […] like a good tradition I visited ng-nl conference (ng-nl 2015, ng-nl […]

]]> By: ng-nl 2016. brief review | Stepan Suvorov Blog https://stepansuvorov.com/blog/2015/02/ng-nl-brief-review/#comment-63198 Fri, 19 Feb 2016 04:17:28 +0000 http://stepansuvorov.com/blog/?p=2334#comment-63198 […] year I also visited NG-NL Conference in Amsterdam and to keep the tradition will share my notes/thoughts about […]

]]> By: Daniel Marjenburgh https://stepansuvorov.com/blog/2015/02/ng-nl-brief-review/#comment-36006 Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:46:00 +0000 http://stepansuvorov.com/blog/?p=2334#comment-36006 Thanks for posting this review!

It is possible to use VisualReview with other tools, because it itself does not depend on Selenium, it just exposes an HTTP REST-like interface. VisualReview does need access to the screenshots, so they need to be uploaded. I don’t think it would be difficult to get the screenshots from Browserstack and then use a script to send them to the VisualReview server. It might even be possible to do it more directly using BrowserStacks ‘local testing’ feature, but I haven’t looked into that. If you have any ideas or questions regarding this, please let us know on GitHub ;)

Daniel

]]> By: Raul Jimenez https://stepansuvorov.com/blog/2015/02/ng-nl-brief-review/#comment-35937 Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:30:07 +0000 http://stepansuvorov.com/blog/?p=2334#comment-35937 Thank you for the nice words!

If you have any comment, suggestion or problem, just send me an email or add an issue at github, and I will be glad to help you :)

Raul

]]>